Mikel Arteta's underrated Arsenal star adds something "people really don’t see"

Arsenal and Mikel Arteta are riding high at the top of the Premier League table, and supporters have been told one player doesn’t get the praise he deserves.

Arsenal's set-piece kings on course to win the Premier League

Their explosive start has not just positioned them as Premier League title favourites, but also as the current kings of set pieces — a deadly weapon that’s wreaking havoc on opposition sides domestically and in Europe.

Arsenal have scored more goals from dead-ball situations than any other top-flight side so far (11), with star defender Gabriel at the heart of it with four contributions to those strikes as the Gunners make their best weapon known.

Arsenal 3-0 Nottingham Forest

Athletic Bilbao 0-2 Arsenal

Arsenal 1-1 Man City

Port Vale 0-2 Arsenal

Newcastle 1-2 Arsenal

Arsenal 2-0 Olympiacos

Arsenal 2-0 West Ham

Fulham 0-1 Arsenal

Arsenal 4-0 Atlético Madrid

Arsenal 1-0 Crystal Palace

Corners, free kicks and even throw-ins have become golden scoring opportunities, as Arsenal turn these situations into major results with surgical precision.

Their aerial strength, combined with clever routines, has made them a nightmare for defenders who can’t afford to lose focus for even a moment.

However, at the heart of Arsenal’s success is their impenetrable defence which has conceded the joint-fewest goals, not only in the Premier League, but across Europe’s top leagues (3), with Gian Piero Gasperini’s Roma also conceding just three.

The arrival of no-nonsense new backroom coach Gabriel Heinze is viewed as a real contributor to Arsenal’s increasingly water-tight backline, which has somehow become even more solid, despite already leaking the fewest league goals of any Premier League side in each of the last two seasons.

David Raya is in line for this third-successive Golden Glove award, and only a complete disaster in terms of injuries to key defenders would disrupt Arteta’s side right now.

That being said, even when William Saliba was briefly forced out of the side through injury, Cristhian Mosquera performed exceptionally well next to Gabriel at the heart of Arsenal’s defence, and fellow summer signing Piero Hincapie is also on hand to step in.

Given their imperiousness at the back, Viktor Gyokeres has been somewhat overshadowed.

The Swede, who was brought in to take the mantle of Arsenal’s new prolific number nine, got off to a flying start but went seven games without a goal before his much-needed brace against Atlético Madrid last week.

Gyokeres has attracted some criticism for his fairly underwhelming return so far, but journalist Graeme Bailey insists that he’s actually a pretty underrated new member of the team.

Viktor Gyokeres adds extra element to Arsenal that people don't see

Speaking to TBR Football, Bailey says that Gyokeres brings an “extra element” to Arsenal that “people don’t really see”.

Interestingly, this thought is echoed by Arteta, who says that Gyokeres makes Arsenal a much more “unpredictable” side.

His in-game play is there for all to see, and the former Sporting CP star has already proved a handful for defenders since his blockbuster summer switch.

Now, Gyokeres just needs to add more goals, then the critics will soon be silenced.

Liverpool exploring Jarrod Bowen move as West Ham share sale conditions

Liverpool are now reportedly exploring a deal to sign Jarrod Bowen after West Ham United shared what it would take for them to sell their star man in 2026.

Those at Anfield have set their sights on another attacking addition with their summer spending yet to come good. Club-record signing Alexander Isak has scored just one goal in all competitions and has largely faced fitness issues during his time at Anfield so far. Meanwhile, Florian Wirtz – although gradually improving – is yet to find the back of the net.

After Isak: Liverpool's "next Michael Owen" is destined to be the club's #9

Arne Slot has an emerging 17-year-old star at Liverpool who could take Isak’s number nine shirt off him.

By
Kelan Sarson

Nov 12, 2025

Suddenly, after a major spending spree, the Reds have looked out of ideas going forward at times. On paper, an attacking blend of Wirtz, Mohamed Salah, Hugo Ekitie and Cody Gakpo should result in endless goals. In reality, however, it’s a combination which simply hasn’t worked so far.

Former Manchester United defender and Sky Sports pundit Gary Neville didn’t hold back after Liverpool’s recent 3-0 defeat against Manchester City either, claiming that Wirtz is a “problem” for Arne Slot.

The November international break has handed the Premier League champions some much-needed reprieve and it’s a break that must see Slot come up with a solution for his side’s problems.

As much as Neville has criticised Wirtz, the truth is that the German hasn’t been Liverpool’s greatest problem in recent weeks. No player in the Premier League has created more chances than the former Bayer Leverkusen man in all competitions, yet the numbers show that he’s got just one assist to his name. For the most part in recent weeks, he’s played his part.

Instead, the big problem lies with those ahead of him who have been wasteful. It’s sparked concerns that Salah could be past his best and those at Anfield are already reportedly eyeing his replacement as a result.

Liverpool exploring Jarrod Bowen move

As reported by Football Insider’s Pete O’Rourke, Liverpool are now exploring a move to sign Bowen ahead of 2026. Whilst West Ham are expected to turn down any advances at this stage, they would reportedly consider selling their captain if an interested party submitted an ‘irresistible’ offer.

Liverpool proved that they’re not afraid to splash the cash in the summer just gone, so the Hammers’ stance should give them a glimmer of hope that they could yet sign Bowen, who shares an agent with Andy Robertson.

As for the forward, himself, if anyone deserves a big move it is him. Bowen has dragged West Ham to European glory, kept them in the Premier League and become an undisputed legend at the London Stadium. Now, if Liverpool come calling, he should grab hold of the opportunity with both hands.

The 28-year-old has already experienced what it’s like to score at Anfield with West Ham, but could yet get the chance to celebrate in front of The Kop week in, week out in 2026.

Jurgen Klopp called Bowen his “favourite player” in 2023 and could watch from afar as the West Ham man completes a move to Merseyside three years later.

Liverpool and Arsenal scouting new right-back who pocketed Gakpo

Slot can ease Wirtz blow by unleashing Liverpool’s “Divock Origi regen”

Those of a Liverpool persuasion are no doubt braced for the imminent return to action, with Arne Slot’s struggling champions hosting Nottingham Forest in the Premier League on Saturday afternoon.

It’s been anything but plain sailing for the Reds this season, and with only three points gained from their past six outings in the top flight, title-defending aspirations have devolved into fears that the Reds will miss out on Champions League qualification for only the second time in a decade.

Last season was nearly flawless until Slot’s champions eased standards toward the final stretch, save for Forest’s shock win at Anfield early in the campaign.

Liverpool will need to be at their best to ensure Sean Dyche does not heap more misery on his side. Set-pieces and long balls have been among the cruxes of this issue-ridden campaign, after all.

And they will have to make do without the creativity of Florian Wirtz, who has been ruled out with a muscle injury sustained with Germany.

The latest on Florian Wirtz's fitness

Wirtz is ruled out this weekend, having checked in after international action with a muscular problem. Conor Bradley is also sidelined, and for a longer period than the 22-year-old. However, Alisson Becker could make his anticipated return from injury.

Wirtz has been at the epicentre of Liverpool’s struggles this season, routinely hounded for his tough integration period after completing a £116m transfer from Bayer Leverkusen in July. The playmaker has yet to score across 16 matches in all competitions, and he has not registered an assist in the Premier League.

Though he struggled during the defeat at Manchester City two weeks ago, Wirtz has shown signs of progress in recent games, and his creativity will be sorely missed against a resilient Forest backline whose low block and resilience under pressure will prove a tough nut to crack at Anfield – last season bears testament to that.

While Cody Gakpo will fancy a return to the starting line-up in Wirtz’s stead, Slot may want to consider a more dynamic option for this one.

And Slot may have just the solution in Liverpool’s new version of Divock Origi.

Slot must unleash Liverpool's new Origi

Origi has achieved cult status at Liverpool. The Belgian striker only scored 41 goals across 175 appearances for the outfit, but his catalogue of big-game moments is something to behold.

His goal in the 2019 Champions League final over Tottenham Hotspur immortalised him on Merseyside.

Divock Origi scores in the Champions League final

Now, Liverpool find themselves enjoying the skill of a new version in Federico Chiesa, who has been unable to nail down a starting role in Slot’s team since completing a £12.5m transfer from Juventus in 2024.

Chiesa toiled through his first year in England, but he’s played a bigger role since the summer, having notched two goals and three assists across all competitions this season. He has played 12 times, yet only two of those appearances have come from the opening whistle.

Hugo Ekitike

16

6 + 1

Mohamed Salah

16

5 + 3

Cody Gakpo

16

4 + 3

Federico Chiesa

12

2 + 3

Alexander Isak

8

1 + 1

Florian Wirtz

16

0 + 3

Rio Ngumoha

7

1 + 0

In the words of reporter Lewis Oldham, “Chiesa has undoubtedly been a flop for Liverpool”, but he’s simultaneously emerged as a “Divock Origi regen” in that he is a rare trump card off the bench and a popular figure besides.

Because for all the hardship Chiesa has been through since joining Liverpool, he has enjoyed some big moments in red. It was the 28-year-old who bagged a consolation in the Carabao Cup final, and he ensured Slot’s side made it a winning start to the current campaign after restoring Liverpool’s lead over Bournemouth back in August.

Chiesa’s wizardry on the ball and natural striker’s instinct could see him slot right into Wirtz’s berth, playing off the left and drifting centrally to accommodate Liverpool’s tactical flow.

Given that the Italian has also won 55% of his ground duels and averaged 0.8 tackles per Premier League fixture this term in spite of not having started a game, he might even be an apt fit for the physical battle that comes with a clash against the Tricky Trees.

Liverpool cannot afford another slip-up at the moment and must secure three points against Nottingham Forest in the Premier League. Given that Chiesa has been among the most coherent and dangerous forwards in Liverpool’s squad, surely it is time he earns a rare starting role in the big league?

Liverpool have a "ruthless" 19-year-old striker who could surpass Ekitike

Liverpool may have found the next big thing in their academy system.

ByAngus Sinclair Nov 20, 2025

Stats – Gill's love for Ahmedabad, and Kohli's Rashid problem

All the stats highlights from India’s third ODI against England

Deep Gadhia12-Feb-2025356 – India’s total while batting first at Ahmedabad is their highest at the venue surpassing the 325 for 5 they posted against West Indies in 2002. South Africa’s 365 for 2 remains the highest by any team at this venue.It is also the joint third-highest total for India against England in ODIs, alongside the 356 for 7 they posted in Pune back in 2017.142 – Runs by which India won the final ODI against England, their second-biggest victory margin against England. The biggest was when India beat them by 158 runs at Rajkot in 2008 courtesy Yuvraj Singh’s unbeaten 138.Related

  • Gill century, and Kohli, Shreyas fifties power 3-0 rout of England

100 – Shubman Gill became the first Indian batter and the 13th overall to score a century in his 50th ODI. Mohammad Kaif’s unbeaten 95 against South Africa in 2003 was the previous best by an Indian in their 50th ODI game.5 – Gill also became only the fifth batter to have scored centuries in all formats at a single ground. He now has a ton each in Tests, ODIs and T20Is in Ahmedabad to add to his three IPL tons at the venue.Quinton de Kock in Centurion, Babar Azam in Karachi, David Warner in Adelaide, and Faf du Plessis in Johannesburg are the other four batters to have scored hundreds across all formats at a single venue.ESPNcricinfo Ltd7 – Hundreds scored by Gill so far in this ODI career of 50 matches, making it the most by an Indian batter in their first 50 games. Shikhar Dhawan had six, whereas all three of Virat Kohli, Gautam Gambhir and KL Rahul had five each.3 – Fifty-plus scores for Gill in this series, including a hundred making him just the seventh Indian batter to have scored more than 50 in all the games of a 3-match bilateral ODI series and the first one to do so against England. Navjot Singh Sidhu in 1994 against West Indies and Shikhar Dhawan in 2014 against Sri Lanka also made three fifties in as many games but were part of a five-match series.11 – Number of times Kohli has been dismissed by Adil Rashid in international cricket, the most for him against a player alongside Josh Hazlewood and Tim Southee. Rashid has got the better of him four times in Tests, five times in ODIs and twice in T20Is.164.70 – Shreyas Iyer’s strike rate against pacers in this series against England. It is the best by an Indian batter who has scored at least 100 runs in an ODI series since 2002. Virender Sehwag’s 161.29 in the Bangladesh Tri-Series in 2010 was the previous best.4 – Consecutive bilateral ODI series lost by England. They have lost to India, Australia and twice to West Indies, all since Dec 2023. Only once before have they lost four on the trot when they lost a series each to South Africa, Australia, Pakistan and India in 2005 and 2006.

Braves Poach Robert Suarez From Padres, Sign Closer to Three-Year Deal

The Braves have signed former Padres closer Robert Suarez to a three-year, $45 million contract, the team announced on Thursday. News of the deal was first reported by ESPN’s Jeff Passan.

As part of the contract, Suarez will be donating 1% of his salary to the Atlanta Braves Foundation. Suarez will make $13 million next season and $16 million in the following two seasons.

Suarez became a free agent after the season when he opted out of the final two years of his deal with the Padres. Last season, Suarez compiled a 2.97 ERA in 70 appearances, with 40 saves in 69 and two-thirds innings pitched. He became the primary closer for the Padres in 2024, and saved 36 games that season. His 40 saves a year ago were a career-high.

Ten memorable Australia-England ODIs

From Border’s win against the odds to Buttler’s announcement of a new era, the matches that have defined the limited-overs version of the rivalry

Andrew Miller18-Jun-20201975 World Cup semi-final, Headingley

After the shock and awe of a bruising Ashes winter, it was nibble and swing that ended England’s inaugural World Cup campaign. On an overcast day at Headingley, Dennis Lillee and Jeff Thomson ceded centre stage to the lower-octane talents of Gary Gilmour, a left-arm swing bowler with just two previous ODIs to his name. On a used wicket, his high-reaching action yawned through a transfixed England line-up – his unreadable induckers accounted for five of his six victims; a massive outswinger did for Tony Greig as he flashed an edge to Rod Marsh. England were routed for 93, and Gilmour’s figures of 6 for 14 in 12 overs remain the most economical haul of five or more in World Cup history. His day wasn’t done yet. England’s own quicks hit back in style and reduced Australia to 39 for 6. Enter Gilmour’s long handle. An uncomplicated 28 not out hauled Australia over the line. He’d follow up with another five wickets in the final at Lord’s, but West Indies prevailed, and he’d play just one more ODI thereafter.1987 World Cup final, Calcutta

It was a match made infamous by Mike Gatting’s reverse-sweep, although the focus on that moment of hubris, midway through a stiff but well-paced run-chase, detracts from the real story of the 1987 World Cup final – Australia’s rise from mid-decade ignominy, as they sowed the seeds of the world domination that would follow in the next two decades. Allan Border’s team had been a rabble for three years, but here was timely vindication for his alliance with Bobby Simpson, a captain-coach partnership that had won just two Tests out of 22 since being pitched together in 1986. It was a first taste of glory for a clutch of soon-to-be-world-beaters – David Boon, Steve Waugh and Craig McDermott among them – and the nearest miss of England’s three losing finals in the space of four tournaments. Australia were helped on their way by partisan support from a 90,000-strong Calcutta crowd, whose own team had had their hold on the trophy ended by England in the Bombay semi-final. The fact that Border’s men had unseated Pakistan at the same stage merely amplified the gratitude.Getty Images1992 World Cup group stage, Sydney

Utterly, utterly preposterous. Ian Botham was yesterday’s news as the 1992 World Cup drew nigh. A back operation had reduced his once-feared bowling to the dibbliest of dobblers, while his centre of gravity as a batsman had been brought low by a lifestyle that refused to defer to the march of time. He’d begun the winter as a pantomime character, literally, playing the King in Jack and the Beanstalk, and at the age of 36, his fabled career was deep into borrowed time. And yet, what Botham may have lost in athletic prowess, he retained in bluff and chutzpah – never more gloriously than with one final crushing blow for his oldest and most storied foes. Australia’s home campaign was already wobbling when Beefy rocked up with a Greatest Hits display in Sydney, claiming four wickets in seven balls, including that of a crestfallen Border, before galumphing to victory with a dismissive half-century. “It was amazing to see how frightened the Aussies were of him,” wrote Alec Stewart in his autobiography. “They played the reputation and were ridiculously tentative.”1997 bilateral series, 3rd ODI, Lord’s

Ben Hollioake is one of the most poignant what-ifs in English cricket. His death in a car crash at the age of 24 traumatised his team-mates, on tour in New Zealand at the time, and left a forever young sheen on a career for which the only real limit would have been his hunger to exploit an effortlessly natural talent. Just imagine him and Andrew Flintoff – born a month apart – blossoming at 5 and 6 in England’s awakening in the early 2000s. Instead, we are left to savour the glory of his international baptism. That ODI debut at Lord’s, at the age of 19, the third of a series in which England were already cresting a wave, 2-0 up and euphoric. Sent in at No.3, and drilling Glenn McGrath straight back down the ground to get off the mark. A fusillade of flogs through and over the covers left a rapt full house purring, then a gorgeous launch into the Tavern Stand put Shane Warne in his place too. He would never match that form for the rest of his all-too-short career. But until the day it ran out, the one thing Hollioake seemed he would always have on his side was time.Getty Images2002-03 VB Series 2nd final, Melbourne

By the early 2000s, the pretence of a rivalry was gone. England hadn’t held the Ashes for more than a decade. Their fortunes on the one-day front were, if anything, even more abject. Going into the second final of the 2002-03 VB Series they were in the midst of a 12-match losing streak against Australia, yet seemed to have found a back-door route to silverware with three overs remaining at Melbourne. Paul Collingwood and Flintoff were steadfast as England coasted towards a target of 225, needing 14 more runs to square the best-of-three final. But this era hadn’t simply been defined by English incompetence, there’d been a fair bit of Aussie brilliance too, and this time it was Brett Lee’s turn to wreck the joint. Nine blistering deliveries were all he needed to scalp the final four wickets; a first-ball stump-splinterer to Flintoff laid out the merciless terms of the surrender.2003 World Cup group stage, Port Elizabeth

If the Melbourne denouement had been a miserable experience, there was something even more galling in store at Port Elizabeth, in the first Anglo-Aussie World Cup clash since 1992. Once again, English hope sprung eternal as Marcus Trescothick and Nick Knight romped to 66 for 0 in nine overs. Once again, it was dashed, this time by Australia’s perpetual understudy. Andy Bichel would not have played had Jason Gillespie been fit. Instead, he put the ball on a string for figures of 7 for 20, the highlights being a pair of savage seamers to Michael Vaughan and Nasser Hussain. And then, after England had made an outstanding defence of a meagre target of 205, Bichel rocked up at 135 for 8 in support of Michael Bevan and turned the game on its head all over again. The decisive moment came in the penultimate over of the innings. Andrew Caddick had been outstanding in claiming Australia’s top four inside his first five overs. But sensing his length might be hittable at the death, Hussain trusted instead the wonder-balls of the rookie James Anderson. Bichel’s contemptuous slap into the St George’s Park scoreboard quickly informed him his instinct had been flawed.2005 NatWest Series 3rd match, Bristol

The mighty Ashes campaign of 2005 did not begin until the end of July. But the prologue would prove to be long and compelling, a perfect phony war in which every microscopic moment would be blown out of all proportion, and flung into an ever-bubbling melting pot. And by the third week of June, Australia were officially “in crisis”. They’d lost in a warm-up to Somerset (aka Graeme Smith and Sanath Jayasuriya on a Taunton stopover); they’d been routed for 79 in their first T20I against England; they’d been stunned by Bangladesh in a thrilling ODI in Cardiff. And now, they were up against England at Bristol, where a certain Kevin Pietersen was primed to inflict on the Aussies a scarcely credible four defeats in a row. At 160 for 6 chasing 253, he jettisoned all reticence and unfurled a full repertoire of haymakers, not least against Gillespie, who was never the same bowler again after bearing the brunt of a match-winning 91 not out from 65 balls. History records that Australia did recover their poise, but Pietersen’s starting berth in the Ashes was suddenly a no-brainer.Getty Images2005 NatWest Series final, Lord’s

It’s a wonder the two teams had any puff left for the main event. The NatWest Series final was a classic of its genre, a low-scoring riot in which the two teams rough-and-tumbled to a standstill, with scrapes, bruises and gouges all over their respective corpses. The match witnessed the last gasp of relevance for the mighty but knackered Darren Gough, whose desire to get one over his old enemy epitomised the growing national fervour, as well as a crucial display of grit from the often-maligned Geraint Jones, whose painstaking 71 rescued England from 33 for 5, in partnership with the no-less-committed Collingwood. Flintoff and Steve Harmison had bowled magnificently to leave England needing 197 for victory, but when Gough was run out from the penultimate ball of the match, with three still needed to win, it was left to Ashley Giles to scramble two leg byes off Glenn McGrath to scavenge a share of the spoils.2013 bilateral series, 4th ODI, Cardiff

In September 2013, England were still wedded to their old-school one-day approach – and not without some justification, having reached the final of that summer’s Champions Trophy. But with Alastair Cook absent, Eoin Morgan found himself at the helm for a contest that would serve as a pathfinder for the team’s future direction. Chasing 228, England’s challenge had crumbled to 8 for 3 thanks to a Clint McKay hat-trick, but was pieced back together by Morgan himself and Michael Carberry, whose doughty 63 would be his solitary half-century in a brief ODI career. When Carberry departed at 126 for 5 after 34 overs, England still needed 102 from 84 balls and looked ready to drown in their own reticence. Enter Jos Buttler at No.7, and soon afterwards, Ben Stokes at No.8 – two grossly under-utilised talents still awaiting their cue to be unleashed. Buttler took his that very day, crashing 65 not out from 48 balls to rip the contest back in England’s favour. McKay popped up in the penultimate over to dislodge Stokes for 25, but the pair had done the needful as victory was sealed with three balls to spare. It would take another two years for England to take the hint.2018 bilateral series, 5th ODI, Old Trafford

In the final countdown to their 2019 date with destiny, England’s transformed one-day players were beginning to believe they could win from any tight situation. And so, after they had eased to a 4-0 lead in an uncommonly one-sided series, there was absolutely no question of the fifth and final ODI at Old Trafford being dismissed as a dead rubber. England’s bowlers proved that point with aplomb, skittling the Aussies for 205 inside 35 overs, but that was just the start of the fun. Ashton Agar bowled Jason Roy in the first over, Billy Stanlake’s cloud-scraping seamers wrecked the middle order, and before England had found their poise, they were 114 for 8, with only Buttler remaining of the men who could make a difference. But with Adil Rashid standing firm for 16 overs, England chivvied, chipped and clattered a route back into the game, with Buttler trusting his team-mate but also his eye, with roughly a boundary every over to keep the required run-rate in check. His response to Rashid’s dismissal, with 11 runs still needed, was to reach his century from the very next ball with a massive six over long-on. He still needed Jake Ball to stand firm for ten agonising deliveries, before crashing Marcus Stoinis over the covers to seal a victory that was no doubt front and centre of England’s thoughts when they found themselves in a similar pickle on the biggest stage of them all.

How can women's cricket learn to use the DRS better?

With reviews infrequently used in bilaterals, poor use of the system in high-stakes events like the Women’s T20 World Cup have cost teams dearly

Raf Nicholson04-Mar-2020It’s the eighth over of Sri Lanka’s group-stage match against Australia at the T20 World Cup, and the visitors have the reigning champions well on the back foot at 30 for 3. Suddenly, Meg Lanning swipes at a wide one outside off stump and edges the ball to the keeper. As one, the Sri Lankans go up: they know they have their woman.Sadly, the umpire doesn’t agree. Even worse, Sri Lanka have already burned through their one DRS review, having made the baffling decision to try and overturn a not-out call for caught behind four overs earlier, also against Lanning, with replays showing that her bat had hit the gloves of the wicketkeeper, not the ball.Lanning goes on to score an unbeaten 41 not out; Australia win the game by five wickets, with just three balls remaining. Not for the first time, poor use of the DRS has quite possibly cost a team a memorable win.World Cup group-stage DRS stats

Successful reviews: 14
India 1, New Zealand 1, England 1, Pakistan 1, Sri Lanka 1, Thailand 1; Australia 2, Bangladesh 2, West Indies 2, South Africa 2
Unsuccessful reviews: 18
Bangladesh 4; India 3, New Zealand 3, England 3, Sri Lanka 3; Thailand 1; South Africa 1; Australia 0, Pakistan 0, West Indies 0

Within men’s cricket, DRS has been a fixture for over a decade, since it was officially introduced in Tests in November 2009. Its adoption has been much slower in the women’s game. The ICC requires both ball-tracking and a sound-based edge detection system (like UltraEdge) to be in place if DRS is to be used. That isn’t cheap, coming in at a price tag of more than US$13,000 per match. When the system was first used in women’s cricket during the 2017 World Cup in England, it was only put in place for the ten games that were broadcast: the teams contesting the 21 remaining matches went without.Only recently has the ICC been prepared to spend its cash on adopting it wholesale at standalone women’s tournaments: it was in use for every match of the 2018 Women’s T20 World Cup in the Caribbean, reflecting the fact that all 23 games were broadcast live; and it is once again available in every match of this current World Cup.That should be a good thing, right? DRS is, at its heart, about overturning bad umpiring decisions and thus making match results fairer. It also (in theory) levels the playing field with the men’s game: if review technology is available in men’s cricket, basic equality says it should also be available for the women’s game.

The majority of teams only ever get the chance to use the system every two years, during World Cups; Thailand, playing in their first world tournament, have never had access to it before

The stats suggest that women’s teams have overall used DRS reasonably well during this tournament. Across 20 group-stage matches, the DRS success rate stands at 44%: of 32 reviews, 14 have been successful, while 18 have seen the original on-field decision upheld. That doesn’t compare too badly with the men’s game: in the men’s World Cup last year there were 34 successful reviews out of 93 called for – a 36.5% success rate.Unfortunately, as ever, it is the reviews that go wrong that are remembered, over and above the times when sides have correctly chosen to use the system. With the eyes of the world on the women’s game, the use of DRS so far this tournament has generated a lot of comment, much of it negative. During India’s opening match against Australia, one fan on Twitter described India’s decision to review an lbw call against Beth Mooney that had pitched well outside leg stump as the worst use of DRS he had ever seen.Noticeably, teams have often appeared to have poor decision-making processes in place. For example, South Africa captain Dane van Niekerk, given out lbw to Pakistan’s Diana Baig, chose to review instantly but then began walking off the pitch, seemingly convinced she was actually out (in fact, ball-tracking eventually granted her a reprieve). Failing to review where they should have has also cost teams big: the most infamous example came in West Indies’ group-stage match against Pakistan, when Hayley Matthews was given out lbw first ball, once again to Baig. By the time Matthews decided to query the decision, it was too late: the available 15 seconds had expired. Had she made up her mind a bit quicker, the on-field decision would have been overturned, and West Indies might have avoided an embarrassing defeat.When West Indies captain Stafanie Taylor was asked if there had been processes put in place back home for her side to practice use of DRS in world tournaments, she said: “No, none.”West Indies are not alone. England lays claim to one of the best-resourced set-ups in the women’s game, yet an ECB spokesperson confirmed that they have no facilities in place to allow them to practise the use of the DRS. Their preparation for the tournament has relied on the team watching videos of previous dismissals.Hayley Matthews’ 15 seconds of hesitation bought her a golden duck in the very first ball of the match•Getty ImagesThe pertinent fact here is that the DRS is not currently in regular use in women’s bilateral cricket. Though New Zealand have utilised it on occasion – notably in their ODI series against India in January 2019 – the majority of teams only ever get the chance to do so every two years, during World Cups. Thailand, playing in their first world tournament, have never had access to it before. And outside of real-time match situations, it is extremely difficult to “rehearse” use of DRS in the same way you can practise other aspects of your game.Within the men’s game, DRS was not introduced at a World Cup until 2015, at a point when it had already been tried and tested by the majority of participating nations in bilateral series, with (generally) much less at stake. To thrust sides into using it only when the eyes of the world are upon them, at just the point when a spot in a global semi-final or final might be at stake, seems rather topsy-turvy. (There is a similar issue for qualifying men’s Associate sides, who often enter World Cups having never used the DRS before.)The ECB says that it is hopeful that future women’s bilateral series held in England will feature the DRS, a decision made after intense criticism surrounding some of the umpiring decisions during the 2019 Women’s Ashes series – notably a horrendous lbw call that went against Fran Wilson in the first ODI. However, its use in other countries is likely to remain uneven. The ICC states that it has no plans to make the DRS compulsory in future bilateral series: “Until it’s used a little bit more widely, it will remain optional, like it is for men’s bilateral ODIs or T20Is,” says Geoff Allardice, the ICC’s general manager of cricket. “It’s up to each board. They can use it – it just comes down to the level of coverage that they mount for the women’s matches.” Host boards, meanwhile, are likely to argue that the associated costs would be prohibitive.The issues we have seen in this tournament with the use of the DRS, then, are unlikely to go away anytime soon. Can anything be done? One possible solution might be to have two DRS reviews per side per innings available in women’s tournaments, instead of one. This would give teams that have little practice at using the system outside of World Cups another chance, should things go awry early in the match.It might be argued that this would only serve to create another point of difference with men’s cricket, but in the case of DRS – with so many more opportunities to practice its use available for men than women – levelling the playing field isn’t always as straightforward as simply making the playing regulations the same. Until the DRS is available more widely to women’s teams outside of world tournaments, an extra review could provide a temporary solution to the eternal cricketing dilemma of how to ensure that as many correct umpiring decisions are made as possible.

Ganguly's 2002 and Kohli's 2020: A tale of two similar whitewashes

Captains’ failures, lanky New Zealand debutants running amok.. and many more

Bharath Seervi02-Mar-2020ESPNcricinfo Ltd Toss

  • New Zealand won the toss in both Tests in both the series and put India in on all four occasions.
  • India were bowled out cheaply in their first innings all four times, making scores of 161, 99, 165 and 242, and went on to lose all the matches.

Results

  • India were handed 10-wicket defeats in the first Test of both the series, asking the home side to chase only 36 and nine runs respectively in the fourth innings. Between these two series, India have lost only three Tests by a margin of ten wickets.
  • In the second Tests of both the series, India managed to gain a marginal first innings lead: a five-run lead in 2002 and seven-run lead in 2020. However, India could not capitalise on the leads and went on to lose the Tests by four wickets and seven wickets respectively.

Batting woes

  • No batsman from either side scored a century in either series. The highest individual score in both the series, in fact, was 89 – by Mark Richardson in 2002 and Kane Williamson in 2020 – and both came in New Zealand’s first innings of the respective first Tests.
  • The last two instances of none of the India batsmen scoring centuries in an entire series have been these two series. Between these two, India have played 60 Test series and there was at least one century in every one of them. The highest scores among India batsmen in these two series were 76 by Rahul Dravid in 2002 and 58 by Mayank Agarwal in 2020.
  • Only three India batsmen could aggregate 100 or more runs in the two series – Sachin Tendulkar in 2002 and Cheteshwar Pujara and Agarwal this year.
  • India’s runs per wicket in the series were 13.37 and 18.05 respectively, which are India’s top-two lowest in any away series.

ESPNcricinfo LtdNew low for Indian captains

  • Sourav Ganguly and Virat Kohli, who are among the most successful Indian captains away from home, suffered their captaincy career’s first whitewash at the end of the series.
  • Both Ganguly and Kohli had forgettable series as batsmen. While Ganguly scored just 29 runs at an average of 7.25, Kohli scored 38 runs at 9.50. For both of them, these two series are their second-worst in terms of batting average. Their averages feature as the two lowest averages by visiting captains (who bat in the top-order) in a series in New Zealand (four or more innings).

Debutant allrounders stand tall

  • In 2002, New Zealand handed a Test cap to Jacob Oram, a 6ft 6in allrounder. In 2020, it was 6ft 8in Kyle Jamieson who made his debut in the series.
  • Oram picked up 11 wickets at an average of 11.81 in the series and scored unbeaten 26 runs in the fourth innings of the second Test to complete the whitewash. Oram had the second-best bowling average among New Zealand bowlers in the series after Daryl Tuffey, who was the Player of the Series.
  • Jamieson took nine wickets at 16.33 and played two crucial knocks of 44 and 49 in the first innings of the two Tests. He finished with the second-best bowling average among his team-mates after Tim Southee, who was the Player of the Series this time.

Vote: What's your favourite celebration?

Nothing gets the heart pumping like an an evocative celebration. Of all the iconic ones currently on show in cricket, which is your favourite?

Dustin Silgardo and Ishita Mazumder07-May-2020Nothing gets the heart pumping like an an evocative celebration. Of all the iconic ones currently on show in cricket, which is your favourite?Illustrations by Ishita Mazumder

Introducing Smart Stats, where context trumps raw numbers

Context includes pitch conditions, quality of opposition, and match situation – in terms of the pressure on the player

ESPNcricinfo stats team01-Oct-2020Cricket is a unique sport in that it has three formats, each distinct from the another. Test cricket is a marathon that places a premium on longevity, discipline and endurance, Twenty20 is a sprint where explosive power is key, while the 50-over game is somewhere in between.But the metrics used to measure performances have remained the same: averages, strike-rates, economy rates. While they are all useful measures, they often don’t tell the whole story because they lack context.Smart Stats fills that gap, analysing batting and bowling performances by taking into account the context in which they occurred.What is Smart Stats?
Smart Stats is a new way of looking at numbers, by adding context to every performance, batting or bowling. Context includes pitch conditions, quality of opposition, and match situation – in terms of the pressure on the player.Smart Stats thus measures the value of every batting or bowling performance.ESPNcricinfo LtdWhy do we need Smart Stats?
Any keen follower of cricket knows that all runs scored and wickets taken are not the same. A run scored under pressure, with the match in the balance, against a top opposition means much more than a run scored in a simpler situation. Similarly, getting someone like Virat Kohli out cheaply means a lot more than getting a tailender’s wicket. Smart Stats makes these distinctions, and puts context to these numbers.What are the new set of metrics?
– Smart runs
– Smart wickets
– Smart strike rate
– Smart economy rate
– Batting/bowling/match impactCan you explain each?
Smart Runs: The runs scored, taking context into account. So, a 30-ball 45 might be worth 50 or 40, depending on when the innings was played and the relative worth of the runs.Smart Wickets: The true value of wickets taken. This is calculated taking into account the quality of the batsman, when the batsman was dismissed – early in his innings or late – and the match context at the time, depending on whether the game was in the balance or if the result was already a foregone conclusion.Smart Strike-Rate: Smart Runs divided by balls facedSmart Economy Rate: Smart Runs conceded by overs bowledImpact: Every batting and bowling performance gets an impact value, based on the Smart Runs, Smart Strike-Rate, Smart Wickets, and Smart Economy Rate. The match impact for a player is the sum of his batting and bowling impact numbers.How does this algorithm help reveal the really good performances which may not be obvious just from the scorecard numbers?
Smart Stats takes into account the pressure on a batsman and bowler at each ball, and helps identify the periods when the batting/bowling team were under pressure, and rewards performances during those phases suitably.Take, for instance, Jasprit Bumrah’s bowling returns of 2 for 32 against Kolkata Knight Riders in IPL 2020. Three bowlers from Mumbai Indians had better numbers in terms of raw figures, but according to Smart Stats, not only was Bumrah the most impactful bowler of the match, but also, marginally, the most impactful player of the game.

That is all because of context. Bumrah’s first three overs went for a mere five runs, and included the wickets of Eoin Morgan and Andre Russell. His last over went for 27, but by then the match was already in the bag, and those runs conceded didn’t count for much. According to Smart Stats, his 32 runs conceded converted into only 24.8 Smart Runs, indicating he did very well when the pressure was relatively high. Rohit Sharma was named Man of the Match for his 54-ball 80, but in terms of impact he was marginally behind Bumrah.So does that mean the actual leaders in Smart Runs and Smart Wickets in earlier IPL seasons could be different from the Orange Cap and Purple Cap holders?
Yes, it does. According to Smart Numbers, David Warner had a slightly higher Smart Runs aggregate than Virat Kohli in 2016, despite Kohli’s aggregate of 973, which was 125 more than Warner’s 848. Similarly, in five of the last seven seasons, the bowler who took the Purple Cap wasn’t the leader in terms of Smart Wickets.Girish TS/ESPNcricinfo LtdCan we select the Man of the Match from Smart Stats?
Yes, we can. The Smart Contribution numbers from each game basically splits the contributions from each team within a total score of 100. That gives the top performers from each team, which can be used to nominate the Man of the Match.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus